Yamaha CS5E
Courtesey
of MCI, Nov 1972
The Yamaha CS5E is a superb little bicycle.
To ride the midget is fun - pure and unadulterated
fun. A considerable pleasure in other words.
But to write the thing up is anything but. After
all, road reports, written all steely eyed and
dispassionate, must be critical. In ideal cases
constructive, in others merely matter of fact,
obvious for all to see, catalogue of faults
and deficiencies. Sure - plug the good points,
the heart-warming points, but set these against
the niggles and nags. And if a machine presents
itself at your doorstep which you find hard,
if not impossible to fault, what then? Credibility
takes an understandable shaking, immediately
words are bandied around like "nearer than
near perfect". Scepticism, suspicion of
motives. Is he getting one free? What's in it
for him? Aren't all press machines prepared
rather better than those for the ordinary customer?
All can be answered with the complacent family
standby "we write what we feel, when we
feel and as we feel". Good old British
justice at its most super-dooper. Sweep all
"lying so-and-so" reproaches aside
- and accept the truth.
Personal interest in Yamahas -the real Yams,
not the four stroke which seemed incongruous
to the range - hardly bordered on the fanatical.
They may have been doing a very fair sweep up
job at most race meetings, making bigger four
strokes look a little red about the neck. And
sure as hell, everyone said they were awfully
fast in standard road trim, but an immovable
and entrenched dislike of Japanese two strokes,
screaming highly tuned through narrow power
bands, at the end of their useful life after
a couple of years, built entirely for speed
and with no great thought for durability, lingered
on, a personal bias that no amount of logic
or evidence could shift.
Then, a half year or so ago, a snazzy little
folder arrived on our desks, goading and full
of ever such tempting colour pics with a small
and neatly scaled down YDS7 as the centre piece.
A restyled Yam 200 no less, fetch-ingly daubed
over with purple and white. But still a little
'bike, still a two stroke and still the taste
buds went unpricked. The editor, asnarl through
knitted brows, mumbled something about "ridden
properly that front wheel shouldn't touch the
ground for long". The remark lay unsought
and unwanted, filed under P for Poetic Licence.
Forgotten. The thing would be ridden one day,
no doubt, but it wasn't a machine that would
have me all niggly and restless with hot anticipation
for.
The seeds of "something good" were
sown when the XS-2 had to be tested. Mitsui's
demo model was late returning from other tes¬ters
and the long walk - well fairly long, and old
age approached fast - to the concessionaires,
hand in hand with paper thin boot soles, built
up a substantial mental block to a pedestrian
journey back to the office. "Anything else
to pinch for the day?" The new 200 if we
wanted it. Unenthusiasm, but any-thing was better
than instant health.
Perhaps it was a general indoctrination in
big 'bikes, or there again a distain of "little
engines" that threw into a hazy subconscious
a mental equasion that said moving above a snail's
pace on small machines requires every ounce
of throttle to be used. So, every ounce was
used. The dial in front of me had wavered something
about four and a half. To be honest, I didn't
really care. It was all rather a bore. And at
that engine speed I had, if I'd have thought
about it at all, envisaged at least three thousand
more revs being needed before anything but anything
happened. The throttle is a quick action affair
- very quick. A quarter of a twist between you
and Yehudi Menuhin. And my, oh my, never ever
underestimate a Yam 200 again. Nonchalance was
rudely and unceremoniously kicked aside by a
great bucking leap forward. Suddenly aroused
from reverie and concentrating again, the front
wheel was watched in surprised, not to men¬tion
horror struck fascination, as it dangled about
from side to side some eighteen inches off the
tarmac.
OK - the engine had felt taut and nervous,
little Nipponese muscles bunching themselves
waiting for their moment. But this was ridiculous.
Bordering on the outright silly. Had I known.
. . . Below me the motor was giggling back at
another sucker taken into the trap, rasping
with all the malevolence of an angry hornet
disturbed from its nest. Such a pity that the
"Stinger" label had been pounced on
by the opposition.
But by then reflex action had poked the gearbox
through into the next ratio. Any hopes that
this may have calmed things down a bit were
left yards back in a hundred pieces. Nothing
had changed.
The miniature though monumental fist jabbered
the rear wheel round with uninterrupted violence,
the eruption beneath me unceasing, going unmitigated
by the higher gear. Yes - the front wheel was
on the road, skimming the stuff lightly, but
things weren't all that much quieter.
I've mentioned once or twice that the Japanese
tls units I've experienced have seldom met the
demands of the machine - ranging from the outright
awful to the mediocre passable. Perhaps all
Yamahas are an exception to this bias. Whatever
it was, the sledgehammer, broomstick-in-the-wheel,
stopping force of the little Yam's front brake
was unexpected. Totally unexpected and nearly
my undoing. A strong handful had been wrenched
on the lever. The world stopped and, for an
instant, the front tyre left a black tracing
of its course in the road. That instant taught
me all the lesson I needed teaching.
From then on retardation was treated with
respect, always thought about. On reflection
and, peculiarly, on that first encounter only,
the machine was well and truly over braked.
It was grabby, and once a certain familiarity
had been reached, it needed no effort to stand
the motorcycle on its front wheel. Literally,
and with no exaggeration whatsoever. Weeks later,
with appetites whetted, the machine came to
us for a fortnight. The intervening time had
obviously seen the brake used hard and the first
violent, fearsomely violent, edge had been removed.
It still remained a good brake - as far as I
was concerned the best Japanese drum yet, but
no longer did it frighten. For hard solo riding
the unit was entirely adequate - reliable, predictable
and firm, still capable of locking at any speed,
despite every part of the drum, even that nearest
the spindle, becoming far, far too hot to handle.
The addition of a pillion made its burden felt,
though. Highest lever pressure had the cover
squealing like a stuck pig, but at maximum application
the lever would inexorably wheeze and finally
sink to the grip, though (and' importantly)
such fade as there was only occurred under the
most exacting conditions.
The CS5E is little changed from the previous
200 - the CS3. So little in fact that, when
the new model was introduced, and large stocks
of frames and crankcases already stamped with
CS3 serials were still held by the factory,
these components were utilised with no alteration
or overstamping whatsoever. All in the name
of logical economy, but earth shattering to
the proud new owner. The changes have really
only been rung in the cosmetics department.
The tank, that all important stylistic maker
or breaker, is a lower, cleaner object, now
matching its shape and paint style more closely
to that of the latest 250 and the 350. The family
likeness thickens. Only one colour scheme is
offered, and although I don't like the connotations
behind such a limited choice of finish, I've
got to admit that the present purple, white
and, thankfully, black frame, is rather fetching.
The CS5E joins its brothers with the meaningless
but nevertheless attractive fippery of matt
black crankcase side covers. Meaningless because
the crank cases themselves are still blissfully
naked alloy. Still - very pretty, pretty. Visually
few other modifications are incorporated. The
barrel finning is now black, while the finning
of the head is squarer, higher and, from the
profile, highly polished. Front forks and rear
dampers have lost their shrouding, the former
adopt¬ing the "Ceriani look" with
inter¬nal springs and the latter wearing
today's norm of exposed springs.
And those, according to Mitsui, were the sum
total of the changes -all of them stylistic
and of little importance to performance. But
glancing through the spec sheet of the CS3 tested
in the '71 issue certain subtle differences
were brought to light. Most important were the
gear ratios. The newer machine carries ratios
substantially lower (higher numerically) and
more widely spaced: CS5 ratios to CS3 - 26.15
(25.02); 17.30 (16.56); 13.11 (12.55); 9.651(^.23);
top, 7.75 (7.42). New whether this modification
was introduced irf a latter batch of the CS3
model is very much open to conjecture.
What is reasonably certain is that the top
speed of the newer machine is higher. The speedo,
due to its positively absurd optimism can, in
this case, act as no more than the merest guide-line,
but at one time, blessed with a light pillion
would you believe, a ludicrous top speed of
96 was recorded. Supposing a speedometer error
- perhaps naively - of some 9 and a bit per
cent, it still leaves one playing around with
an 87/88mph 200cc machine. Which ain't hanging
around. At this velocity, rev countings were
8100, a mere 100 over the red line, but well
over the optimum power point. (Is there any
law on earth which says that rev meters should
be any more accurate than speedometers?) Soil's
fast. Indecently fast. Carburation, compression
and claimed max power remain identical to that
of the earlier machines, so apart from quizzical
eyebrows at the porting and crankcase filling
departments, one is left wondering at the newly
gotten urge.
One possible, and unexplained, factor contributing
to the increase in top speed could be a weight
saving of some 22 Ibs in the CS5. Don't ask
me how it's done - all the logical weight savers
are as before, mudguards, tank, etc. But it
is lighter. Or - perhaps, nastily, the imagination
of the Japanese spec sheet writer took a more
than usually optimistic turn. All but mere variations
on an enigma.
The only other improvement was in the electrical
department. The battery to be precise; a unit
now uprated from 5*/2 a.h. to 9.
The performance is explosive. Perhaps such
guts from such a little engine tends to blind
one to the 'bike's other attributes. Certain
machines, acclaimed by one and all, with ultimates
in acceleration and top speed, have vanished
from immediate glowing memory through small,
fleeting and so occasional doubts in their road-holding
capabilities. And. from an entirely personal
view, roadholding is the most influential characteristic
- the thing that separates enjoyment from a
mere job of work. A chore. Blameless reputations
mean nothing to me. and can be banished, albeit
unfairly, after the first and perhaps utterly
harmless slip or slide. Rings of confidence
dissolve into a mist of suspicion, suspicion
once thrown up never to be quite forgiven or
forgotten. Such seeds of doubt were never, ever
sown by the Yamaha -the thing remaining exemplary
no matter how abused or thoughtlessly thrown
about. So -solo it was perfect, but weight on
the pillion and fast, stupidly fast almost,
sweeps introduced a certain movement from the
rear. A wallow that was more the suspension
(set at its hardest) sogging up road irregularities
and a.gentle sway in the process than anything
else. Never did show the slightest signs of
becoming uncontrollable or leading to the sort
of thing that one jerks awake at. As I say,
a gentle sway from the rear end, nothing more.
A little machine being asked to do a great deal,
but never enough to deter from abso¬lute
enjoyment.
And perhaps "enjoyment" is the keynote
to the CS5E. The machine was ridden at every
opportunity, drudge journeys loosing any vestige
of the mundane, other more important duties
left undone. It's hard to pinpoint just why
the thing was so enjoyed. It obviously had something
to do with a machine that so outrage¬ously
exceeded every demand made of it, which did
everything and anything that it was intended
to do, and did it with so much to spare. And,
naturally, the small childish joy of sizzling
ahead of motorcycles two, perhaps three times
its size hardly went uncherished.
Throughout our test time with the 'bike it
was, perhaps unsurprisingly bearing in mind
its small capacity, ridden to the full. There
was seldom any happy medium betweeen full on
and full off. It is that sort of machine, beckoning
incessantly to the rider to ride quickly, using
every one of the 22 Japanese horses. And the
horses were not easily tired. I had had many
evil thoughts that on a long jaunt, tune would
be affected, the finest degree lost through
what I knew would be one hell of a thrashing.
Finally a journey to Derbyshire presented itself.
The motorway route was well known and detested,
a long sit before a featureless screen. Hard
to blame the drivers who fell asleep at their
wheels. But the A6 was as much of a mystery
as any southern midland road can be, and running
almost parallel to the motorway virtually deserted,
the hopeless optimist in me figured.
Apart from the early morning mist (some call
it fog) which left a cloying and impenetrable
murk on my visor, the journey was ridden fast.
The machine skimmed from one built up area to
the next, never overtaken by any vehicle of
any description. True - ridden in this manner
and with scarce thought to anything but forward
motion, it did use rather a lot of petrol. An
horrendous amount. The heavy hand taken as read,
maximum pace resulted in the unbelievable consumption
of 36 miles per gal. Which may happily preclude
the machine from the grey, unambitious clutches
of the out and out commuter brigade. Variations,
dependant on riding style, of two stroke consumption
are legendary. I don't possess the worthy patience
of others to sit for hour upon dizzying hour
at a steady 30 mph to attain a figure which
I feel will be of virtual irrelevance to readers
of MCI. So, no "best" mpg figure was
tried for, and the mere fact that less exuberant
rid¬ing around town threw up approximately
48 miles to the molten gold will have to suffice.
Estimates, gained from other owners and other
tests, might say 50mpg, but life would certainly
be duller at this speed. No - consumption, though
it may be the biggest (if not only) black mark
against the Yam, is still a small, barely entertainable
price to pay for such performance.
The darkling return journey, once the iniquities
of the beyond hope visor had been hurled far
behind, was carried out at a pace a mere fraction
slower than that of the daylight run. The lights
are good without being outstanding -up to 90
per cent of the machine's performance. Cat's
eyes, as opposed to the white line, quickly
restore the remaining ten per cent, so no great
valid complaint can really be laid at the illumination.
The simple point of the previous two paragraphs
is to emphasise the fact that for 300 miles
that day, the CSS was forced to its maximum.
300 miles full throttle effort is a lot of work
for a 200 motor, a motor that was being treated
in a way that an owner with considerations of
longevity and repairs to take into account would
be insane to treat his engine. Not once, and
to be honest, much to my surprise, did the thing
miss, splutter or in any way fail me. Another
age would have spoken of "a sterling effort".
I will just say good - damn good, particularly
bearing in mind the beating the thing had taken,
without any attention, for the previous fourteen
days. And I emphasise again that so little of
those fourteen days were spent at anything but
the fullest of full throttles.
The gearbox was obviously used far more than
would be the case on a larger capacity machine.
But this emerged as another enchanting feature
of the thing. Light, positive, forgotten about.
Frying your changes to their crispest in fact
demanded that on upward selections the clutch
was ignored. A solid, uninterrupted power flow,
alteration of ratios denoted by a slight lowering
of the engine's buzzing monotone. And by that
only. After continual abuse such as this, neither
gearbox nor clutch spoke any word of complaint.
Mutch clutch slipping, if such pointlessness
took your fancy, inevitably resulted in a half
inch or so of extra play at the lever's end,
but so much less than on other machines.
Power characteristics, for such a highly tuned
unit, were remarkably civilised. There was torque
to be had, should you look for it. Indeed the
machine could be left in lowest gear, clutch
out of sight and mind, and the starter stabbed
to throw the thing into life. The Yam would
typically lurge forward for half a yard perhaps,
and then immediately catch, chuffing along at
its tickover speed of a thousand steady rpm
(a wonderfully reliable 1000 rpm). And still
the clutch would be forgotten. Impractical,
of course, but indicative of the measure of
the man below. The dividing line between mere
conveyance and exhilaration lay at 4.5. The
world was a far, far more interesting place
after that. Once the excitement had started
the only noticeable power step, and this a small
one, started at a quiver below 7000, itself
500rpm below the claimed maximum power situation.
Using these engine speeds in all the gears it
had to be a very determined and four times more
expensive sports car that could stay on the
absurd little creature's tail up to 60 miles
an hour. More probably, on reflection.
I do have my doubts about the dearly beloved
A10. So much more nimble, stable and agile.
Several years experience would have to have
been gained before that Yam's true qualities
could be appreciated, and with those capabilities
for medium distance, more than respectably paced
touring, one wonders still further. And, of
course, with the thing's monumental power to
weight ratio, adolescent horsing around, such
as absolutely effortless power wheelies in first
and - though with a little more attention -
second gear, became a part of everyday riding.
Comments from other riders, one of them in a
professional road testing position, ranged from
"what a wonderful toy" to "utterly
delightful".
Please e-mail the webmaster if you have a picture
worth adding to our database, e-mail: webmaster@motorbike-search-engine.co.uk
|